![]() ![]() We tested it with a range of music, movie and gaming tests, as well as making full use of the driver’s mixer and effect settings. We haven’t heard discernibly poor audio from a dedicated sound card in years, and the DG is no exception. The DG’s rated output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is 105dB. More expensive Xonar cards have 192KHz/24-bit playback and 96kHz/24-bit recording, for example. The CMI8786 is a lower-spec processor most conspicuously, it has a maximum sample rate of 96KHz/24-bit for playback and 48KHz/24-bit recording. ![]() It’s a relation of the Oxygen HD CMI8788 processor that’s present on Asus’ more expensive sound cards (it’s rebadged as an Asus AV100 or AV200 on these). The Xonar DG is built around a C-Media Oxygen HD CMI8786 audio processor. Naturally, Asus has cut costs in a number of areas compared with the more expensive models in the Xonar range, and we were keen to see exactly what form the cost cutting takes. With 5.1 analogue surround sound, the obligatory optical S/PDIF output and variable impedance settings so that you can optimise the card’s analogue stereo output for various types of headphones, it has a lot in its favour. The Xonar DG is a remarkably inexpensive half-height PCI sound card, but it isn’t cheap and nasty.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |